This report would be hilarious, if it wasn't so outrageous. Note that even the Guardian, probably the leading global daily in environmental reporting, is so uneducated on the technicalities of climate change that neither the editor nor the reporter understand that the notion of a "non-carbon" liquid fuel intended for standard internal combustion engines is an oxymoron. (They meant "no fossil carbon.") With such rampant ignorance, no wonder we can be so easily scammed!
And school boards all over the country think science education is "expensive."
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/apr/01/biofuels.energy
No comments:
Post a Comment
I'm sorry to have to say that the number of spam comment postings has required that we turn off anonymous comment posting. There's been a massive boom in what seems like computer-automated spam comments with links to web pages that advertise cheap, nasty, bad-for-you products, mostly cigarettes.
From now on, you'll have to be a registered user to comment on this blog.
If you had something you wanted to say, but really didn't want your name attached to it for some good reason, you should email Mick at mwomersley@unity.edu
I'll protect your confidentiality and post your comment for you.